Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)

A-TIER

OpenRouter

Intelligence Score 83/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32k
Pricing Model Free / Open

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 83/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free) by 10 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window
32k 200K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~88-91%
Release Date
Sep-Nov 2024 Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
20 requests/minute 60 RPM
Daily Limit
50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup) Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
👁️ Vision & Multimodal General Purpose
Model Size
72B Unknown
Limitations
  • Limits depend on account history/topup
  • Community key models
  • Free models have lower priority during peak demand
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Unified API for 100+ models from all providers
  • OpenAI-compatible endpoint (drop-in replacement)
  • Automatic model fallback and routing
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons