Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Qwen 2.5

LLM7.io

Intelligence Score 65/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 32K

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Google

Intelligence Score 91/100

Context Window 1M

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

Commercial/Paid Model

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 65/100, Gemini 2.5 Flash outperforms Qwen 2.5 by 26 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Gemini 2.5 Flash.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Qwen 2.5	Gemini 2.5 Flash
Context Window	32K	1M
Architecture	Transformer (Open Weight)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~85-87%
Release Date	Sep-Nov 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	30 RPM (no signup) / 120 RPM (free email token)	2,000 RPM
Daily Limit	Up to 5M tokens/day (rolling 24h, with free token)	1,500 requests/day (free tier)
Capabilities	No specific data	Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	Undisclosed	~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations	No signup tier is heavily rate-limited (30 RPM) Smaller, less well-known provider — verify uptime before production use	API key required Rate limits vary by region
Key Strengths	Works with zero signup OpenAI-compatible endpoint — swap base_url + key No signup required for basic use	Low-latency High-volume tasks Reasoning capable