Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen 2.5
LLM7.io
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Llama 3.1 405B
S-TIERVenice.ai
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
128K tokens
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Llama 3.1 405B Wins
With an intelligence score of 91/100 vs 65/100, Llama 3.1 405B outperforms Qwen 2.5 by 26 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 405B.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen 2.5
|
Llama 3.1 405B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32K | 128K tokens |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
Sep-Nov 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM (no signup) / 120 RPM (free email token) | 10 RPM (free tier) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Up to 5M tokens/day (rolling 24h, with free token) | Limited daily usage |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | 🐢 Slower (Reasoning) |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 405B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen 2.5
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 4 Scout Instruct (Free)
Llama 3.1 405B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B