Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen-Turbo

Qwen (Alibaba)

Intelligence Score 78/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 78/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Qwen-Turbo by 14 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen-Turbo
GPT-4o (via routing)
Context Window
32K tokens 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Requires Alibaba Cloud account (Payment method)
  • Dashboard can be complex
  • Region selection matters
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Qwen Family: Top tier open weights
  • Multimodal capabilities (VL models)
  • Search Plugin integration
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons

Qwen-Turbo
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
Qwen-Turbo
vs
Qwen-Max
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Qwen-Max
Qwen-Turbo
vs
Qwen-Plus
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Qwen-Plus
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)