Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen-Turbo

Qwen (Alibaba)

Intelligence Score 78/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 70B

A-TIER

Lepton AI

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 8K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 78/100, Llama 3.1 70B outperforms Qwen-Turbo by 9 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen-Turbo
Llama 3.1 70B
Context Window
32K tokens 8K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Reasoning
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium âš¡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 70B
Limitations
  • Requires Alibaba Cloud account (Payment method)
  • Dashboard can be complex
  • Region selection matters
  • Credits needed for production volume
  • Smaller model selection than aggregators
  • Focus on deployment over just API
Key Strengths
  • Qwen Family: Top tier open weights
  • Multimodal capabilities (VL models)
  • Search Plugin integration
  • Standard OpenAI-compatible APIs
  • Deploy custom models with one command
  • High throughput optimization

Similar Comparisons