Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507

Nebius (Token Factory)

Intelligence Score 76/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 256K Context
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Qwen3.8 27B

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 131K Context
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 Wins

With an intelligence score of 76/100 vs 65/100, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 outperforms Qwen3.8 27B by 11 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Qwen3.8 27B
Context Window
256K Context 131K Context
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Credit-based 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
235B 27B
Limitations
  • $1 credit is small (good for testing)
  • Limited model selection compared to aggregators
  • Beta features may change
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Nebius Studio: Interactive playground
  • OpenAI Compatibility: Easy swap
  • Cost Effective: Competitive pricing
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
vs
Mistral Large
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Mistral Large
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
MiniMax M3
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
DeepSeek V4 Flash (0731)
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super 120B