Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3 30B A3B
Cloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
79/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERKilo AI Gateway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 79/100, StepFun Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Qwen3 30B A3B by 4 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3 30B A3B
|
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32K Context | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~70-74% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies by model | 200 requests/hour per IP (free models, per community submission) |
|
Daily Limit
|
10,000 neurons/day | Default free models only |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
30B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Qwen3 30B A3B
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3 30B A3B
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3 32B (Fast)
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3 32B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.6 27B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.8 27B