Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3 32B
Groq
Intelligence Score
79/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
DeepSeek-R1
S-TIERChutes.ai
Intelligence Score
97/100
Context Window
64K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek-R1 Wins
With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 79/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Qwen3 32B by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek-R1.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3 32B
|
DeepSeek-R1
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 6k TPM | 64K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Dense Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~70-74% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jan 2025 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | Varies (community capacity) |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Subject to availability |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | 🐢 Slower (Reasoning) |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | 🧠 Complex Reasoning |
|
Model Size
|
32B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3 32B
vs
Whisper Large v3
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Whisper Large v3
Qwen3 32B
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
Qwen3 32B
vs
Groq Compound
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Groq Compound
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Groq Compound Mini
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
DeepSeek-R1
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
DeepSeek-R1
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
DeepSeek-R1
vs
GPT-OSS 20B