Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3 32B
Groq
Intelligence Score
79/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Qwen3 32B Wins
With an intelligence score of 79/100 vs 65/100, Qwen3 32B outperforms Groq Compound by 14 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3 32B
|
Groq Compound
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 6k TPM | 250 RPD, 70k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~70-74% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
32B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3 32B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
Groq Compound
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
Qwen3 32B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
Groq Compound
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
Qwen3 32B
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Groq Compound
vs
Allam 2 7B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B