Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Nebius (Token Factory)

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Long context
Pricing Model Free / Open

Command A Reasoning

S-TIER

Cohere

Intelligence Score 94/100
Context Window 256K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

Command A Reasoning Wins

With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 65/100, Command A Reasoning outperforms Qwen3.5 397B A17B by 29 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Command A Reasoning.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Command A Reasoning
Context Window
Long context 256K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~88-91%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 100+ RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Based on tier
Capabilities
No specific data
Advanced Reasoning Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
397B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • $1 credit is small (good for testing)
  • Limited model selection compared to aggregators
  • Beta features may change
  • API key required
Key Strengths
  • Nebius Studio: Interactive playground
  • OpenAI Compatibility: Easy swap
  • Cost Effective: Competitive pricing
  • First Cohere reasoning model
  • Nuanced problem-solving
  • Agent-based tasks

Similar Comparisons