Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Nebius (Token Factory)
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Long context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Gemini 3.1 Flash
DEPRECATEDGoogle AI Studio
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
96/100
Context Window
1M Context, 15 RPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Gemini 3.1 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Gemini 3.1 Flash outperforms Qwen3.5 397B A17B by 31 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Gemini 3.1 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
|
Gemini 3.1 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Long context | 1M Context, 15 RPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2026 (Expected) |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 5-30 RPM (varies by model) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Varies by model (Flash / Flash-Lite only; Pro models are paid) |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
Thinking
Multimodal
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
397B | ~1.5T (estimated) |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
vs
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemini 3.1 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemini 3.0 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemini 3.0 Flash-Lite
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Gemini 3.1 Flash
vs
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking