Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Nebius (Token Factory)

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Long context
Pricing Model Free / Open

inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 83/100
Context Window 262K Context
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms Qwen3.5 397B A17B by 18 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
Context Window
Long context 262K Context
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Dynamic limits (adaptive per 15-minute window, not a fixed RPM) 20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs)
Daily Limit
Credit-based 200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
397B Undisclosed
Limitations
  • $1 credit is small (good for testing)
  • Limited model selection compared to aggregators
  • Beta features may change
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Nebius Studio: Interactive playground
  • OpenAI Compatibility: Easy swap
  • Cost Effective: Competitive pricing
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons