Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3.5 4B
SiliconFlow
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Step 3.7 Flash
DEPRECATEDRouteway
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Qwen3.5 4B by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3.5 4B
|
Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
262K Context | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Fixed limits for free models — exact figures require login, verify on cloud.siliconflow.cn/models | 5 RPM on :free models |
|
Daily Limit
|
Not fully published — verify on docs.siliconflow.cn | 200 requests/day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
4B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3.5 4B
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3.5 4B
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3.5 4B
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 9B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
StepFun Step 5 Preview
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B