Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen3.8 27B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
131K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERKilo AI Gateway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, StepFun Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Qwen3.8 27B by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for StepFun Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen3.8 27B
|
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
131K Context | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | 200 requests/hour per IP (free models, per community submission) |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Default free models only |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
27B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Allam 2 7B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Allam 2 7B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Qwen3.8 27B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 4 Scout
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Whisper Large v3
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Groq Compound
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Groq Compound Mini