Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen3Guard-Gen-0.6B (Beta)

OVH AI Endpoints

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 65/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Qwen3Guard-Gen-0.6B (Beta) by 28 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen3Guard-Gen-0.6B (Beta)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window
32K tokens 200K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~88-91%
Release Date
2024 Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
2 RPM (Anonymous) / 400 RPM (Auth) 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Unspecified Credit-based
Capabilities
Text
Reasoning
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
0.6B Unknown
Limitations
  • Beta service, may end or change
  • 2 requests/minute for anonymous usage
  • Requires token for higher limits (400 RPM)
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Data sovereignty (EU)
  • Beta access to premium models
  • Simple integration
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons