Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Solar Pro

Upstage

Intelligence Score 77/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

meta/llama-3-70b-instruct

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 83/100
Context Window 8K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

meta/llama-3-70b-instruct Wins

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 77/100, meta/llama-3-70b-instruct outperforms Solar Pro by 6 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Solar Pro
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Context Window
32K tokens 8K tokens
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~75-79%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Varies by model
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium âš¡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 70b
Limitations
  • Credits expire after 3 months
  • Focus on document processing
  • Smaller context window (32k)
  • Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive)
  • Cold starts for less popular models
  • Trial credits are minimal
Key Strengths
  • Solar Architecture: Depth-Up-Scaling
  • Specialized in OCR and Document Parse
  • Translation capabilities (KO/EN/JA)
  • Run any public model with an API
  • Fine-tune existing models easily
  • Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models

Similar Comparisons