Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERRouteway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GPT-OSS 120B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
1k RPD, 8k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, Step 3.7 Flash outperforms GPT-OSS 120B by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Step 3.7 Flash
|
GPT-OSS 120B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
See provider | 1k RPD, 8k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Proprietary) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
5 RPM (community submission) | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
200 requests/day | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 120B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b (free)
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
OpenAI: gpt-oss-120b (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Allam 2 7B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Allam 2 7B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama 4 Scout
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Whisper Large v3
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Whisper Large v3 Turbo
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Groq Compound