Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERKilo AI Gateway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
GLM 5.2
Scaleway Generative APIs
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, StepFun Step 3.7 Flash outperforms GLM 5.2 by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for StepFun Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
|
GLM 5.2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
See provider | 256K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
200 requests/hour per IP (free models, per community submission) | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Default free models only | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
GLM 5.3
GLM 5.2
vs
Mistral Large
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
GLM 5.2
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
GLM 5.2
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct