Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Thinking Machines Inkling
OpenRouter
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1M Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERRouteway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Thinking Machines Inkling by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Thinking Machines Inkling
|
Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1M Context | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
20 requests/minute | 5 RPM (community submission) |
|
Daily Limit
|
50 requests/day (up to 1000 with $10 topup) | 200 requests/day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Thinking Machines Inkling
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Flash (free)
Thinking Machines Inkling
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Google: Gemini 2.0 Pro (free)
Thinking Machines Inkling
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Mistral: Small 3 (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)