Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

TinyLlama

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open

DeepSeek Coder V2

A-TIER

Ollama

Intelligence Score 85/100
Context Window 64K tokens
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek Coder V2 Wins

With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 64/100, DeepSeek Coder V2 outperforms TinyLlama by 21 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek Coder V2.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
TinyLlama
DeepSeek Coder V2
Context Window
Local 64K tokens
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent Hardware limited
Daily Limit
Unlimited Unlimited
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 💻 Code Generation
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
  • Depends on your RAM/GPU
  • Laptop fans will spin up
  • Large models (70B+) need heavy hardware
Key Strengths
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server
  • Local Inference: Data never leaves your device
  • Modelfiles: Script your own system prompts
  • API: Local REST API for app integration

Similar Comparisons