Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

TinyLlama

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Llama 3.1 8B

Groq

Intelligence Score 78/100
Context Window 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 8B Wins

With an intelligence score of 78/100 vs 64/100, Llama 3.1 8B outperforms TinyLlama by 14 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
TinyLlama
Llama 3.1 8B
Context Window
Local 14.4k RPD, 6k TPM
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~70-74%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Unlimited 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 8B
Limitations
  • File sizes are large (contain weights)
  • CLI usage often required
  • Windows requires appending .exe
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Executable weight files (multi-OS)
  • Integrated Web UI
  • OpenAI Compatible API server
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

TinyLlama
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
TinyLlama
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
TinyLlama
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Llama 3.1 8B
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct