Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

TinyLlama

llamafile

Intelligence Score 64/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window Local

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

A-TIER

Replicate

Intelligence Score 83/100

Context Window 8K tokens

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 64/100, meta/llama-3-70b-instruct outperforms TinyLlama by 19 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for meta/llama-3-70b-instruct.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	TinyLlama	meta/llama-3-70b-instruct
Context Window	Local	8K tokens
Architecture	Transformer (Open Weight)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~75-79%
Release Date	2024	2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	Hardware dependent	Varies by model
Daily Limit	Unlimited	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	No specific data
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	70b
Limitations	File sizes are large (contain weights) CLI usage often required Windows requires appending .exe	Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive) Cold starts for less popular models Trial credits are minimal
Key Strengths	Executable weight files (multi-OS) Integrated Web UI OpenAI Compatible API server	Run any public model with an API Fine-tune existing models easily Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models