Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Yi Vision

01.AI

Intelligence Score 79/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 4K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model

Groq Compound Mini

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Yi Vision Wins

With an intelligence score of 79/100 vs 65/100, Yi Vision outperforms Groq Compound Mini by 14 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Yi Vision
Groq Compound Mini
Context Window
4K 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Architecture
Transformer Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
10,000 RPM 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Based on tier 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
👁️ Vision & Multimodal ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

Yi Vision
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Yi Vision
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Yi Vision
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Qwen3 32B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Allam 2 7B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Groq Compound Mini
vs
Llama 4 Scout