Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GLM-4.5-Flash
A-TIERZ.AI (GLM)
Intelligence Score
83/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GLM-4.5-Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, GLM-4.5-Flash outperforms Llama 3.1 (Deployable) by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GLM-4.5-Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GLM-4.5-Flash
|
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~75-79% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
~1 request/second (Flash models) | Pay-per-second compute |
|
Daily Limit
|
~1,000 requests/day (Flash tier) | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
B-Tier (Strong) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 3.3 70B Instruct (free)
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
NVIDIA: Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B (free)
GLM-4.5-Flash
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Maverick (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Meta: Llama 4 Scout (free)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.2 3B
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.2 11B Vision
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
vs
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct