Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GLM-4.7-Flash

A-TIER

Z.AI (GLM)

Intelligence Score 83/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Qwen3.5 (Cloud)

Ollama Cloud

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window Varies
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GLM-4.7-Flash Wins

With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, GLM-4.7-Flash outperforms Qwen3.5 (Cloud) by 18 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GLM-4.7-Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GLM-4.7-Flash
Qwen3.5 (Cloud)
Context Window
128K Varies
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
~1 request/second (Flash models) Light usage tier, 1 concurrent model
Daily Limit
~1,000 requests/day (Flash tier) Session limit resets every few hours
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Free Flash tier capped near 1 request/second
  • Flagship GLM-5.2 model requires a paid plan
  • Free-tier limits have changed more than once in the past year — verify on docs.z.ai
  • No specific limitations documented
Key Strengths
  • GLM-4.5-Flash & GLM-4.7-Flash Free Access
  • Strong Coding Benchmarks
  • OpenAI-Compatible Endpoint

Similar Comparisons

GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Qwen3.5 (Cloud)
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
GLM-4.5-Flash
Qwen3.5 (Cloud)
vs
GLM-4.5-Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash
vs
GPT-OSS 120B (Cloud)
Qwen3.5 (Cloud)
vs
GPT-OSS 120B (Cloud)
Qwen3.5 (Cloud)
vs
GPT-OSS 20B (Cloud)
Qwen3.5 (Cloud)
vs
DeepSeek V4 Flash (Cloud)