Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Groq Compound
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Groq Compound by 31 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 4.1 Fast.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
Groq Compound
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 250 RPD, 70k TPM |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen3 32B
Groq Compound
vs
Qwen3 32B
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen3.6 27B
Groq Compound
vs
Qwen3.6 27B
Groq Compound
vs
MiniMax M2.7
Groq Compound
vs
Allam 2 7B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Scout