Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen 2.5 72B
S-TIERHyperbolic
Intelligence Score
91/100
Context Window
32K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 91/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Qwen 2.5 72B by 5 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
Qwen 2.5 72B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 32K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~85-87% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | Sep-Nov 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 72B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
DeepSeek V3
Qwen 2.5 72B
vs
Qwen3 32B (Fast)