Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Qwen3.6 27B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
131K tokens
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Qwen3.6 27B by 31 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 4.1 Fast.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
Qwen3.6 27B
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
2M | 131K tokens |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~92-95% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Varies (low for free tier) | 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | 14,400 Requests/Day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | 27B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Groq Compound
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
Groq Compound
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Groq Compound Mini
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
Groq Compound Mini
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
GPT-OSS 120B
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
Qwen3.6 27B
vs
Qwen3 32B