Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large

A-TIER

GitHub Models

Intelligence Score 88/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 256K
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

Groq Compound

Groq

Intelligence Score 65/100
Context Window 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large Wins

With an intelligence score of 88/100 vs 65/100, AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large outperforms Groq Compound by 23 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
Groq Compound
Context Window
256K 250 RPD, 70k TPM
Architecture
SSM-Transformer Hybrid (Mamba) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~60-64%
Release Date
2024 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by Copilot Tier 30 RPM, 14.4k RPD
Daily Limit
Low 14,400 Requests/Day
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) C-Tier (Good)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Restrictive limits
  • Requires GitHub account
  • Rate limits vary by Copilot tier
  • Test
Key Strengths
  • Prototyping
  • LPU Accelerated
  • Extremely Fast Inference
  • Open Source Models

Similar Comparisons

AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
GPT-4o
Groq Compound
vs
GPT-4o
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
AI21 Jamba 1.5 Large
vs
Phi-4
Groq Compound
vs
Phi-4
Groq Compound
vs
Mistral Large (24.11)
Groq Compound
vs
Cohere Command R+
Groq Compound
vs
Allam 2 7B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 3.3 70B
Groq Compound
vs
Llama 4 Maverick 17B