Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Any GGUF Model

KoboldCpp

Intelligence Score 65/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Customizable
Pricing Model Free / Open
View Provider Analysis →

GPT-4o

S-TIER

OpenAI

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
Commercial/Paid Model
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o outperforms Any GGUF Model by 27 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Any GGUF Model
GPT-4o
Context Window
Customizable 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~60-64% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 10,000 RPM
Daily Limit
Unlimited Based on tier
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • UI is functional but dated
  • Mainly for GGUF format
  • Configuration has learning curve
  • API key required
  • Rate limits apply
  • Pay-per-token pricing
Key Strengths
  • Context shifting (Smart Context)
  • Visual Novel mode
  • Stable Diffusion integration
  • Advanced reasoning
  • Code generation
  • Creative writing

Similar Comparisons

Any GGUF Model
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Any GGUF Model
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
GPT-4o
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Any GGUF Model
vs
Mistral (Any version)
GPT-4o
vs
Mistral (Any version)
GPT-4o
vs
Phi-3 (Any version)
GPT-4o
vs
Any Local Model
GPT-4o
vs
Any HuggingFace Model
GPT-4o
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)