Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-4o
S-TIEROpenAI
Intelligence Score
92/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model
Any HuggingFace Model
Cerebrium
Intelligence Score
65/100
Context Window
Model-dependent
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-4o Wins
With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 65/100, GPT-4o outperforms Any HuggingFace Model by 27 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for GPT-4o.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-4o
|
Any HuggingFace Model
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K | Model-dependent |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~85-87% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
May-Nov 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
10,000 RPM | Pay-per-second compute |
|
Daily Limit
|
Based on tier | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
Vision
Function Calling
Streaming
JSON Mode
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
~1.8T (estimated) | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-4o
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Llama 3.1 (Any Size)
GPT-4o
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Gemma 2 (Any Size)
GPT-4o
vs
Mistral (Any version)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Mistral (Any version)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Phi-3 (Any version)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Any GGUF Model
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Any GGUF Model
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Any Local Model
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
Llama 3.1 (Deployable)
Any HuggingFace Model
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)