Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Auto (best free model)
Onomeo
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
Unknown
Pricing Model
Free / Open
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
DEPRECATEDKilo AI Gateway
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 65/100, StepFun Step 3.7 Flash outperforms Auto (best free model) by 18 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for StepFun Step 3.7 Flash.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Auto (best free model)
|
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
Unknown | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
12 requests/minute per key | 200 requests/hour per IP on free models (anonymous use allowed) |
|
Daily Limit
|
30 free-model calls every 5 hours per account | Default free models only |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Auto (best free model)
vs
StepFun Step 5 Preview
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
StepFun Step 5 Preview
Auto (best free model)
vs
DeepSeek V4 Flash
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Auto (best free model)
vs
DeepSeek V4 Pro
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
DeepSeek V4 Pro
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GLM 5.3 Flash
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GLM 5.2
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite