Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

DEPRECATED

Requesty

This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

DeepSeek-V4 Pro

A-TIER

DeepSeek

Intelligence Score 80/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 80/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms DeepSeek-V4 Pro by 13 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
DeepSeek-V4 Pro
Context Window
200K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~75-79%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • 10M tokens is one-time only
  • API can be slow during peak hours (Chinese business hours)
  • Rate limiting during high demand periods
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • DeepSeek-R1: OpenAI o1-level reasoning (open-source)
  • Mixture-of-Experts architecture for efficiency
  • OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement)

Similar Comparisons