Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

DeepSeek-R1

S-TIER

Chutes.ai

Intelligence Score 97/100
Context Window 64K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

DeepSeek-R1 Wins

With an intelligence score of 97/100 vs 93/100, DeepSeek-R1 outperforms Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) by 4 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
DeepSeek-R1
Context Window
200K 64K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~92-95%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 Jan 2025
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Varies (community capacity)
Daily Limit
Credit-based Subject to availability
Capabilities
Reasoning
Reasoning
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate
Medium 🐢 Slower (Reasoning)
Primary Use Case
General Purpose 🧠 Complex Reasoning
Model Size
Unknown Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Availability depends on community GPU donors
  • Speed varies with demand
  • Models may be temporarily unavailable
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Community-powered GPU network
  • Free access to large open-source models
  • OpenAI-compatible API format

Similar Comparisons