Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

DEPRECATED

Requesty

This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

GPT-4o (via routing)

DEPRECATED

Requesty

This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 92/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms GPT-4o (via routing) by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
Context Window
200K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~85-87%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models 50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models
Capabilities
Reasoning
Vision
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons