Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
S-TIERRequesty
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
A-TIERRequesty
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins
With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 87/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 6 points.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
|
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
200K | 128K |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~80-84% |
|
Release Date
|
Jun-Oct 2024 | Jul 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 60 RPM |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | A-Tier (Excellent) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | âš¡ Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Unknown | 70B |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|