Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 87/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 6 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
200K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium âš¡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown 70B
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons