Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

GPT-4o (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Evenly Matched!

Both models score 92/100 and have comparable capabilities.

🎯 Selection Guide:
Choose GPT-4o (via Coze) for free tier access.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
GPT-4o (via routing)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~85-87%
Release Date
May-Nov 2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM Varies by model
Daily Limit
Credit-based Token-based daily limits
Capabilities
Vision
Vision
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
~1.8T (estimated) ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace

Similar Comparisons

GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via Coze)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)