Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

GPT-4o (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 92/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 92/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms GPT-4o (via Coze) by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	GPT-4o (via Coze)	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window	128K	200K
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~85-87%	~88-91%
Release Date	May-Nov 2024	Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	Varies by model	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Token-based daily limits	Credit-based
Capabilities	Vision	Reasoning
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	~1.8T (estimated)	Unknown
Limitations	Daily token limits on free tier Platform-specific API format Bot-centric usage model	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	Visual bot/agent builder Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini) Plugin marketplace	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing