Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 90/100

Context Window 1M

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 90/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze) by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	GPT-4o (via routing)	Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
Context Window	128K	1M
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~85-87%	~85-87%
Release Date	May-Nov 2024	Feb-May 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	Varies by model
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Token-based daily limits
Capabilities	Vision	No specific data
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	~1.8T (estimated)	~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Daily token limits on free tier Platform-specific API format Bot-centric usage model
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Visual bot/agent builder Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini) Plugin marketplace