Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Google

Intelligence Score 99/100

Context Window 2M

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

Commercial/Paid Model

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 99/100 vs 92/100, Gemini 3.1 Pro outperforms GPT-4o (via routing) by 7 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	GPT-4o (via routing)	Gemini 3.1 Pro
Context Window	128K	2M
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~85-87%	~92-95%
Release Date	May-Nov 2024	2026 (Expected)
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	2,000 RPM
Daily Limit	Credit-based	1,500 requests/day (free tier)
Capabilities	Vision	Vision Function Calling Streaming JSON Mode Web Search
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	~1.8T (estimated)	~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	API key required Rate limits vary by region
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Complex tasks Creative concepts Best-in-class reasoning