Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

A-TIER

llamafile

Intelligence Score 81/100

Context Window Local

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 81/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms LLaVA 1.5 by 12 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)	LLaVA 1.5
Context Window	200K	Local
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~75-79%
Release Date	Jun-Oct 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	Hardware dependent
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Unlimited
Capabilities	Reasoning	Vision
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Unknown	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	File sizes are large (contain weights) CLI usage often required Windows requires appending .exe
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Executable weight files (multi-OS) Integrated Web UI OpenAI Compatible API server