Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

Replicate

Intelligence Score 76/100

Context Window 32K tokens

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 76/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms mistralai/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2 by 17 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)	mistralai/mistral-7b-instruct-v0.2
Context Window	200K	32K tokens
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~70-74%
Release Date	Jun-Oct 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	Varies by model
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Credit-based
Capabilities	Reasoning	No specific data
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Unknown	7b
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Pay-per-second billing (can be expensive) Cold starts for less popular models Trial credits are minimal
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Run any public model with an API Fine-tune existing models easily Cold boots can be slow for unpopular models