Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Hyperbolic

Intelligence Score 91/100

Context Window 32K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 91/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Qwen 2.5 72B by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)	Qwen 2.5 72B
Context Window	200K	32K
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~85-87%
Release Date	Jun-Oct 2024	Sep-Nov 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Credit-based
Capabilities	Reasoning	No specific data
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Unknown	72B
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Credits are limited ($1) Decentralized nature may vary latency Billing flow involves crypto/stripe
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Verifiable Inference (verified computing) Low Cost due to decentralized compute Privacy focused