Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

Qwen (Alibaba)

Intelligence Score 78/100

Context Window 32K tokens

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 78/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Qwen-Turbo by 15 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)	Qwen-Turbo
Context Window	200K	32K tokens
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~70-74%
Release Date	Jun-Oct 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Credit-based
Capabilities	Reasoning	No specific data
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Unknown	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Requires Alibaba Cloud account (Payment method) Dashboard can be complex Region selection matters
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Qwen Family: Top tier open weights Multimodal capabilities (VL models) Search Plugin integration