Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

SDXL

A-TIER

Lepton AI

Intelligence Score 84/100
Context Window Image
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 84/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms SDXL by 9 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
SDXL
Context Window
200K Image
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~75-79%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Unknown Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Credits needed for production volume
  • Smaller model selection than aggregators
  • Focus on deployment over just API
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • Standard OpenAI-compatible APIs
  • Deploy custom models with one command
  • High throughput optimization

Similar Comparisons

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
stability-ai/sdxl
SDXL
vs
stability-ai/sdxl
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
SDXL
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Mistral 7B
SDXL
vs
Mistral 7B
SDXL
vs
WhisperX
SDXL
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
SDXL
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)