Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

SDXL

A-TIER

Lepton AI

Intelligence Score 84/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Image
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
View Provider Analysis →

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

GPT-4o (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 92/100 vs 84/100, GPT-4o (via routing) outperforms SDXL by 8 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
SDXL
GPT-4o (via routing)
Context Window
Image 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Credits needed for production volume
  • Smaller model selection than aggregators
  • Focus on deployment over just API
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Standard OpenAI-compatible APIs
  • Deploy custom models with one command
  • High throughput optimization
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons

SDXL
vs
stability-ai/sdxl
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
stability-ai/sdxl
SDXL
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
SDXL
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Mistral 7B
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
WhisperX
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)