Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Codestral Latest
A-TIERLLM7.io
Intelligence Score
86/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
256K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERRouteway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Codestral Latest Wins
With an intelligence score of 86/100 vs 83/100, Codestral Latest outperforms Step 3.7 Flash by 3 points.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Codestral Latest
|
Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
256K Context | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~80-84% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM (no signup) / 120 RPM (free email token) | 5 RPM (community submission) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Up to 5M tokens/day (rolling 24h, with free token) | 200 requests/day |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
A-Tier (Excellent) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
💻 Code Generation | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Codestral Latest
vs
Codestral
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Codestral
Codestral Latest
vs
Codestral 2508
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Codestral 2508
Codestral Latest
vs
GPT OSS 120B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GPT OSS 120B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Laguna XS.2
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Gemma 4 31B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
StepFun Step 3.7 Flash
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
DeepSeek-R1
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Qwen 2.5