Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
DeepSeek V3
S-TIERDeepInfra
Intelligence Score
94/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
64K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Phi-2
Cloudflare Workers AI
Intelligence Score
70/100
Context Window
2K
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
DeepSeek V3 Wins
With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 70/100, DeepSeek V3 outperforms Phi-2 by 24 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for DeepSeek V3.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
DeepSeek V3
|
Phi-2
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
64K | 2K |
|
Architecture
|
Dense Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~65-69% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM (varies by model) | Varies by model |
|
Daily Limit
|
Credit-based (no daily cap) | 10,000 neurons/day |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
Reasoning
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
DeepSeek V3
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
Phi-2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 (free)
DeepSeek V3
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
Phi-2
vs
DeepSeek: R1 Distill Llama 70B (free)
DeepSeek V3
vs
DeepSeek Coder V2
Phi-2
vs
DeepSeek Coder V2
Phi-2
vs
DeepSeek-R1
Phi-2
vs
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Phi-2
vs
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Phi-2
vs
Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
Phi-2
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Phi-2
vs
DeepSeek-R1