Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

A-TIER

Google AI Studio

Intelligence Score 85/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 1M Context, 15 RPM

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

A-TIER

DeepSeek

Intelligence Score 80/100

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 85/100 vs 80/100, Gemini 1.5 Flash outperforms DeepSeek-V4 Pro by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Gemini 1.5 Flash	DeepSeek-V4 Pro
Context Window	1M Context, 15 RPM	128K
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Dense Transformer
Est. MMLU Score	~80-84%	~75-79%
Release Date	Feb-May 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	15 RPM (Flash) / 30 RPM (Flash-Lite) / 2 RPM (Pro)	60 RPM
Daily Limit	1,500 RPD (Flash) / 50 RPD (Pro)	Credit-based
Capabilities	Multimodal	No specific data
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate	⚡ Very Fast	Medium
Primary Use Case	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps	General Purpose
Model Size	~1.5T (estimated)	Undisclosed
Limitations	Data used for training (Unpaid tier) Rate limits are enforced per minute/day No SLA for free tier	10M tokens is one-time only API can be slow during peak hours (Chinese business hours) Rate limiting during high demand periods
Key Strengths	Multimodal Capabilities Huge Context Window (up to 2M tokens) Fast Inference Speed	DeepSeek-R1: OpenAI o1-level reasoning (open-source) Mixture-of-Experts architecture for efficiency OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement)