Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

S-TIER

Google AI Studio

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 1M Context, 10 RPM
Pricing Model Free / Open

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 92/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite outperforms GPT-4o (via routing) by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite
GPT-4o (via routing)
Context Window
1M Context, 10 RPM 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~85-87%
Release Date
Dec 2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
2-15 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
1,500 RPD (Flash) / 50 RPD (Pro) Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
Vision
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast Medium
Primary Use Case
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps General Purpose
Model Size
~1.5T (estimated) ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • Data used for training (Unpaid tier)
  • Rate limits are enforced per minute/day
  • No SLA for free tier
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Multimodal Capabilities
  • Huge Context Window (up to 2M tokens)
  • Fast Inference Speed
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons